Why Are You Here?
Because of this blog's checkered past, I don't anticipate a lot of traffic. So for a while it's going to be my own personal echo-box. Still, I enjoy shameless introspection as much as the next guy, and who knows but we'll get some good discussion going here. Ultimately, this site will become the antithesis of what it used to be.
The previous owners of this corner of cyberspace were BYU students who hated it here in Happy Valley, Utah. They were vocal about their hatred for the school, the church, the sub-culture, and all its various policies. However, at the same time, they said they got too many "tax breaks" by being a member to ever give it up.
I have a different theory. It can be put down as fact that they all believed the benefits of being here outweighed the costs. It's a simple matter of economics: if it really sucked as bad as they said it did, they would leave. Now, knowing this, we're left with the question of why they're so vocal about their dislike. I think the real issue is non-conformity.
Utah Valley is homogeneous, so in an effort to be their own kind of beautiful, people seek ways of differentiating themselves. Sometimes people do this in a positive way, i.e., becoming a better person, developing a certain talent, etc. Others differentiate themselves in a negative way, viz. getting a nose-ring, dyeing their hair, shoplifting, or in the case of my predecessors, finding fault in BYU and the church and airing their disagreements in a public internet forum.
The question remains. Why? Why do people differentiate themselves negative ways when there are so many positive things they could do to be different? Why be "robot" or "Jason S." when you could be "the kid who volunteers at the local foodbank" or "the kid who teaches a Cajun-cooking class at UVSC"? Is it by accident? Is it human nature?
Speak, for thy servant heareth.
The previous owners of this corner of cyberspace were BYU students who hated it here in Happy Valley, Utah. They were vocal about their hatred for the school, the church, the sub-culture, and all its various policies. However, at the same time, they said they got too many "tax breaks" by being a member to ever give it up.
I have a different theory. It can be put down as fact that they all believed the benefits of being here outweighed the costs. It's a simple matter of economics: if it really sucked as bad as they said it did, they would leave. Now, knowing this, we're left with the question of why they're so vocal about their dislike. I think the real issue is non-conformity.
Utah Valley is homogeneous, so in an effort to be their own kind of beautiful, people seek ways of differentiating themselves. Sometimes people do this in a positive way, i.e., becoming a better person, developing a certain talent, etc. Others differentiate themselves in a negative way, viz. getting a nose-ring, dyeing their hair, shoplifting, or in the case of my predecessors, finding fault in BYU and the church and airing their disagreements in a public internet forum.
The question remains. Why? Why do people differentiate themselves negative ways when there are so many positive things they could do to be different? Why be "robot" or "Jason S." when you could be "the kid who volunteers at the local foodbank" or "the kid who teaches a Cajun-cooking class at UVSC"? Is it by accident? Is it human nature?
Speak, for thy servant heareth.
